Tech Policy Girl

To content | To menu | To search

Electronic Voting

Entries feed - Comments feed

Wednesday 27 August 2008

Voting Machines Drop Votes

by lowjumpingfrog on FlickrHere's a QA nightmare: for the past ten years the voting machines made by Premier Election Solutions (formerly Diebold) have had a bug in their software that causes votes to be dropped. According to an article in the Washington Post the problem occurs when votes are transferred from a memory card to a central tallying server and, as Premier officials note, inconsistencies are caught only when (if?) cross-checking is done by elections officials as part of the results certification process. The most notable state affected by this bug is of course a hotly contested one -- Ohio.

Due to the fact that elections systems changes must be certified by the Fed, it could take two years or more to get the issue resolved. In the meantime it will be considered a 'known issue', and presumably elections officials will be notified and advised of the problem.

The kick of the story though is that Premier first declared the issue human error. Then recanted and blamed it on Antivirus software. And then, as Dan Goodin of The Register puts it... finally 'confessed' to a logic error.

Wednesday 20 August 2008

No More Shacking Up With Ohio Voting Machines

by ShutterCat7 on Flickr Apparently some folks in Ohio have been hosting electronic voting machines at their slumber parties. Poll workers, in that hotly contested state, frequently bring the machines home with them for days leading up to elections. I'm not sure I understand why this would be necessary -- and frankly, any arguments I've read about (it allows pollworkers to avoid charges incurred by moving companies,) make no sense to me. Clearly I'm not the only one who doesn't buy these arguments because Ohio's Secretary of State has issued a directive stating that this practice will no longer be allowed.

Via Why Tuesday.

(By the way, the AP news posting states that extra costs incurred by this change would be covered by federal funding, but I don't see anything that indicates so in the directive).

Monday 7 January 2008

Voting Machines

My Grandmother is convinced that the world has been destroyed by computers. While she has always been an early adopter of every new kitchen or household gadget that hit the market, she is vehemently against anything that could be described as digital. When she heard that television would eventually change to digital format she swore that the day television switched over to digital would be the day her TV would go into the garbage. When I asked her why the idea of digital television upset her so much she didn't have an answer. Her reaction was purely emotional and, to me, completely illogical. To some, my own negative reaction to touch-screen voting is also illogical, mostly because I live in an area that uses an optical scan voting system and thus people wonder why I even care.

So I was happy to read the New York Times Magazine's article on electronic voting in yesterday's edition. It's comprehensive, interesting, and an appropriate read to ring-in this new (election) year.